Method and system of presenting a document to a user

ABSTRACT

A method and system for presenting a document to a user. The method comprises the steps of providing a plurality of documents having one or more language translations; specifying a preferred order of languages for the user; and when the user requests a search term, searching the plurality of documents for those that contain the search term. The method comprises the further steps of matching the language translations of the documents containing the search term with the preferred order of languages for the user; and delivering, for each of the documents containing the search term, a best match language translation to the user. With the preferred embodiment of the invention, the following functionalities are enabled: (1) Present to the user his preferred translation or a default translation if the preferred has not yet been made available to the system; (2) Present to the user the “best available” translation, given an order of preference, or a default translation if none of the “better” translations are available; and (3) Present to the user the “best available” translation using a user&#39;s specified preference, or, if none of those translations are available, the “best available” according to a system level specified preference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention generally relates to identifying and presenting documentsfrom computer databases. More specifically, the invention relates tomethods and systems for determining which language in which to present adocument when the document is available in more than one language.

2. Prior Art

Over the last several years, the amount of material accessible bycomputer searching and the geographic reach of computer searching,particularly via the Internet, have both grown enormously. As a result,today, many documents that can be accessed are actually available inseveral languages. Prior art searching systems, however, do not provideany systematic procedure for determining which language to present ordeliver a document when the document is available in more than onelanguage. Moreover, with many searching systems, if a document is notavailable in a particular language (commonly the searcher's homelanguage), the document is not identified at all, and the searcher doesnot even become aware of its availability.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of this invention is to improve methods and systems forpresenting documents identified through a computer search.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a procedure fordetermining the language in which to present a document when thedocument is available in more than one language.

A further object of the invention is to allow a document searchingapplication to continue a document search even though the preferredlanguage is not available for a given object.

These and other objectives are attained with a method and system forpresenting a document to a user. The method comprises the steps ofproviding a plurality of documents having one or more languagetranslations; specifying a preferred order of languages for the user;and when the user requests a search term, searching the plurality ofdocuments for those that contain the search term. The method comprisesthe further steps of matching the language translations of the documentscontaining the search term with the preferred order of languages for theuser; and delivering, for each of the documents containing the searchterm, a best match language translation to the user.

With the preferred embodiment of the invention, the followingfunctionalities are enabled:

-   1. Present to the user his preferred translation or a default    translation if the preferred has not yet been made available to the    system.-   2. Present to the user the “best available” translation, given an    order of preference, or a default translation if none of the    “better” translations are available.-   3. Present to the user the “best available” translation using a    user's specified preference, or, if none of those translations are    available, the “best available” according to a system level    specified preference.

Further benefits and advantages of the invention will become apparentfrom a consideration of the following detailed description, given withreference to the accompanying drawings, which specify and show preferredembodiments of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 generally outlines a preferred method embodying the presentinvention.

FIG. 2 shows a logical data model that may be used to implement theinvention.

FIG. 3 shows the objects in which a language preference may bespecified.

FIG. 4 is a table providing sample data used to demonstrate thecapabilities of this invention.

FIG. 5 shows a first part of a procedure for presenting a translation toa user according to a first capability of this invention.

FIG. 6 shows the second part of the procedure for presenting thetranslation to the user according to the first capability of theinvention.

FIGS. 7 and 8 show a program for presenting the translation to the useraccording to the second capability of this invention.

FIGS. 9 and 10 show a program for presenting the translation to the useraccording to a third capability of the present invention.

FIGS. 11-13 show a first program that may be used to implement thisinvention.

FIG. 14 shows a second program that may be used to carry out theinvention.

FIG. 15 shows a computer system that may be used in the practice of theinvention.

FIG. 16 illustrates a memory medium that can be used to hold a computerprogram for carrying out this invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

This invention, generally, relates to a method and system for presentinga document to a user. With reference to FIG. 1, the method comprises thesteps of providing a plurality of documents having one or more languagetranslations, and specifying a preferred order of languages for theuser. When the user requests a search term, the plurality of documentsare searched for those documents that contain the search term. Thelanguage translations of the documents that contain the search term arematched with the preferred order of languages for the user; and for eachof the documents that contain the search term, a best match languagetranslation is delivered to the user.

The preferred embodiment of the invention employs several mechanisms:

-   1. Textual or descriptive data which requires translation to needed    languages;-   2. Separation of language sensitive data from metric data;-   3. An optional default translation; and-   4. A language preference measurement which specifies the priority in    which available translations are to be presented to the end-user.

Textual or descriptive data which requires translations to neededlanguages are referred to herein as “language sensitive data.” Theseattributes (like Product Description, Help Text, Code Value Long Name)are members of entities or objects which often contain other data whichis not sensitive to language such as metric, monetary or codified data.Data which is not sensitive to language are referred to herein as metricdata. Attributes such as Product Price or Unit of Measure are examplesof this kind of data. There may be many objects in the system whichembody data which requires translation. In the following logical model,the attribute “Object Language Attribute” is a sample of languagesensitive data, and “Object Non-Language Attribute” is not.

The separation of language sensitive data from metric data is notnecessary to the practice of the invention in its broadest sense, butdoes provide a higher level of data normalization, protecting metricdata from update anomalies and redundancy. Using this separation, datasuch as Product Price will be stored only once, regardless of the numberof translations available for its related textual data such as ProductDescription. This concept is shown in the logical model as the entity“Object” which contains metric data, and “Object with Language” whichcontains language sensitive data.

An optional default translation allows for a simple retrieval scheme toobtain some translation if the preferred language has not been madeavailable. For example, because it is the most universally spokenlanguage, an English translation of all textual data could be madeavailable for all language sensitive data. In the following model, theentity “Object with Language” would house a default translation forevery instance of “Object” identified by “Object_ld”.

The language preference measurement, as mentioned above, specifies thepriority in which available translations are to be presented to theend-user. This weighting factor can be controlled at several levelswithin the system. For example, this factor can be a system levellanguage prioritization, an object level language prioritization, or auser or user group specified language preference measurement.

System level language prioritization requires a weighting of everylanguage which may be present in the system. This level of controlimplies that all users of the system will see the same availabletranslations. For example, if the system level preference is to seeFrench first, then Spanish, then English if available and one piece ofdata has Spanish only, then all users of the system will see the Spanishtranslation.

Object level language prioritization requires a weighting of each objectwhose language sensitive data is stored within the system. Examples ofan object are Catalog, Product, Contract, Manufacturing Operation and soon. Each of these objects may specify its own preference. An object mayalso choose to denormalize the System level preference, storing thatpreference with its language sensitive data.

A user or user group specified language preference measurement. Thisdata specifies the priority in which available translations are to bepresented to the end-user. For example, one user may prefer French,Spanish, if French is not available, or English if Spanish is also notavailable. This level of control may be designed for a variety of “user”or “user organization” levels. For example, a “person specific”implementation would allow individual specification of languagepreference. This may be contrasted with a “department specific”implementation which would allow those persons who are members of thesame department to share a common language preference specification.Other, more generic design might be made in addition to businessorganizations. The following model allows for such a generic groupingthrough the use of a “User Group” which would eventually be associatedto a person through some relational means.

These mechanisms may be employed in a physical implementation of thelogical data model shown in FIG. 2. This model is the basis for thetechnical details and examples described below.

As a result of the use of the above-discussed mechanisms, severalfunctionalities are enabled. One functionality is to present to the userhis preferred translation, or a default translation if the preferred hasnot yet been made available to the system. Another functionality is topresent to the user the “best available” translation, given an order ofpreference, or a default translation if none of the “better”translations are available. A third functionality is to present to theuser the “best available” translation using a user's specifiedpreference, or if none of those translations are available, the “bestavailable” according to a system level specified preference.

The user of relational technology, such as that found in the databasemanager software DB2, allows for the design of table pairs which willhouse the “Object/Object with Language”. The design would also implementthe “preference” mechanism in any table deamed necessary. With referenceto FIG. 3, in the following example, language preference is specified:

-   1. at the System Level via the System_Level_Prio column in table    NLS.Lang-   2. at an Object Level via the Object_Level_Prio column in table    NLS.Object_with_Lang-   3. at a User Level via the UserGrp_Level_Prio column in the table    NLS.User_Group_Prio

Specific examples of these capabilities are given below, and sample dataused to demonstrate these capabilities are shown in FIG. 4.

A first capability of this invention, as mentioned above, is to presentto the user his preferred translation or a default translation if thepreferred has not yet been made available to the system.

This capability operates when given a preferred language (e.g. “GR”) andthe expected default language (e.g. “EN”). The follow discussed SQL hasbeen broken into two parts to show its operation. Part I, shown in FIG.5, is used to obtain the best available language by preference level.The results of running Part I against the sample data is included. Referto the “Object with Language” sample data shown in FIG. 4.

This statement uses the object level preference and looks for a statedpreferred language (i.e. German) and specifies the default language asEnglish (EN). The answer set reveals that Object A has a best preferenceof 2 (whose language is unknown, but it is either German or English).The sample data included shows those rows eliminated by the “whereclause” of “GR” and “EN” (those languages which are not either of thosehave been crossed out). The shaded background indicates the “best” orminimum preference available for each object.

If the preferred language had been French (FR), then best availablewould be inverted (e.g. ObA 1 and ObB 2) because French is available forObA and not ObB. If Spanish (SP) had been specified, the preferenceswould have been ObA as 2 and ObB as 3 because Spanish is not availableat all, and English has two different preference levels stated based onthe Object.

The answer set form Part I is included in the SQL statement shown inFIG. 6, which now obtains the actual translated text for each row fromPart I. Joining the subselect (Part I) to the nls.object_with_lang_tableallows for EN when it is the only language available (other thanGerman), but ferrots out EN when 01 is available for the desiredlanguage.

FIGS. 7 and 8 show a program for the second capability of the preferredembodiment of the invention, which is to present the user the “bestavailable” translation, given an order of preference, or a defaulttranslation if none of the “better” translations are available. FIGS. 9and 10 provide a program for the third capability, which is to presentto the user the “best available” translation using a user's specifiedpreference, or, if none of those translations are available, the “bestavailable” according to a system level specified preference.

Two code samples that may be used to implement this invention are givenin FIG. 11-13 and FIG. 14. Both of these code samples are written in theJava programming language and employ the use of SQL (Structured QueryLanguage) to obtain data housed in a relational database managementsystem. The sample of FIGS. 11-13 includes two descriptions requiringthe “best match translation.” The sample code of FIG. 14 includes asingle description requiring the “best match translation.”

As will be understood by those skilled in the art, any suitablecomputing system or apparatus may be used to practice this invention.For example, a suitable computer system illustrated at 50 in FIG. 15 maybe used. System 50, generally, comprises a series of CPUs, a cachesubsystem 54, and a random access memory (RAM) 56. Also, as will beunderstood by those skilled in the art, the present invention may beembodied in a computer program storage device (including softwareembodied in a magnetic, electrical, optical or other storage device).One suitable storage medium is illustrated, for example, at 60 in FIG.16.

The preferred embodiment of the invention, as described above in detail,provides a number of significant advantages. Among these are improvedend user satisfaction, increased application reliability, phased intranslation enablement, and a visual clue that the object is availablebut not translated to the desired language. In addition, the presentinvention provides a broad and easy to implement solution that has anunlimited preferred language priority specification, and the end usercan continue to use the application even though the preferred languageis not available for a given object.

While it is apparent that the invention herein disclosed is wellcalculated to fulfill the objects previously stated, it will beappreciated that numerous modifications and embodiments may be devisedby those skilled in the art, and it is intended that the appended claimscover all such modifications and embodiments as fall within the truespirit and scope of the present invention.

1. A method of presenting a document to a user, comprising the steps of:providing a plurality of documents having one or more languagetranslations; specifying a multitude of sets of language priorities,each of said sets including a given preferred order of languages,including the steps of: i) specifying a first set of system levellanguage priorities, ii) for each of a group of defined documents,specifying an associated second set of object level language priorities,and iii) specifying a third set of user level language priorities; whensaid user requests a search term, searching said plurality of documentsfor those said documents containing said search term; for each of saiddocuments that contains the search term and that is one of said group ofdefined documents, delivering said each of said documents to the user ina language determined by said associated second set of object levellanguage priorities; and for each of said documents that contains thesearch term and that is not one of said group of defined documents,delivering said each of said documents to the user in a languagedetermined by said user level language priorities, if said each documentis available in one of the user level language priorities; and if saideach document is not available in any of said user level languagepriorities, then presenting said each document in the language that isthe highest, of any available languages, in said system level languagepriorities.
 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein: the includes thefurther step of specifying a default language; and the delivery stepincludes the step of, in the document is not available in any of theuser level language priorities, and is not available in any of thesystem level language priorities, then presenting the document to theuser in the default language.
 3. A method according to claim 1, for usewith a multitude of users, each of the users being in one of a multitudeof groups, and each of said groups being associated with a respectiveone of said sets of language priorities, and wherein: the step ofselecting one of said sets of language priorities includes the step of,for each user, selecting the one of the sets of language prioritiesassociated with the group said each user is in.
 4. A method according toclaim 3, wherein said documents are in a multitude of languages, and theorder of languages in one of said sets of language priorities is basedon weighting of every one of said multitude of languages.
 5. A method ofpresenting a document to a user, comprising the steps of: providing aplurality of documents having one or more language translations;specifying a multitude of sets of language priorities, each of said setsincluding a given preferred order of languages, including the steps of:i) specifying a first set of system level language priorities, ii) foreach of a group of defined documents, specifying an associated secondset of object level language priorities, and iii) specifying a third setof user level language priorities; when said user requests a searchterm, searching said plurality of documents for those said documentscontaining said search term; matching said language translations of saiddocuments containing said search term with said preferred order oflanguages for said user; and delivering, for each of said documentscontaining said search term, a best match language translation to saiduser; and wherein: the delivery step includes the steps of, i) if thedocument is not one of said group of defined documents and is availablein more than one of the languages in said selected, user preferred orderof languages, then presenting to the user the document in the languagethat is the highest, of the available languages, in said selected, userpreferred order of languages, and ii) if the document is not one of saidgroup of defined documents and is not available in any of the languagesof the user preferred order of languages but is available in one or moreof the languages in the system preferred order of languages, thenpresenting the document to the user in the language that is the highest,of the available languages, in said system preferred order of languages.